CFTC Backs Crypto.com in Nevada Prediction Market Appeal

The CFTC signaled support for Crypto.com as Nevada challenges sports-related prediction markets in court.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has thrown its support behind Crypto.com in an escalating legal dispute with Nevada regulators over sports-related prediction markets.
The development marks another flashpoint in the growing battle between federal derivatives oversight and state gaming enforcement, particularly in states aggressively targeting event-contract platforms. This is the first action we’ve seen from Selig since he said the CFTC would support the growing prediction market sector. Selig has recently been outspoken regarding the CFTC’s role in prediction markets, none so boldly than when he penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, stating exactly where he sees the CFTC’s place in these ongoing disputes.
Meanwhile, Selig just published a WSJ op-ed announcing the CFTC is filing an amicus brief supporting https://t.co/cCqSoNep3S against state regulators. The chairman of a federal agency is publicly fighting states who want to restrict the industry he oversees. pic.twitter.com/dT1Jg2X7Oq
— Adhi Rajaprabhakaran (@eightyhi) February 17, 2026
The CFTC’s backing suggests the agency does not intend to remain on the sidelines as states pursue injunctions and civil enforcement actions against federally regulated exchanges.
What the Dispute Is About
Nevada regulators have argued that sports-based prediction contracts offered by crypto and exchange platforms constitute unlicensed sports wagering under state law. Nevada is involved in several legal battles over prediction markets, including one with Coinbase.
State officials maintain that:
- Sports contracts resemble traditional bets
- Platforms lack Nevada gaming licenses
- State gambling statutes apply regardless of federal commodities status
Crypto.com and similar operators counter that their contracts are federally regulated financial instruments under the CFTC’s jurisdiction.
CFTC Signals It Will Not “Sit Idly By”
In public remarks, CFTC officials indicated the agency would not passively allow states to undermine federally regulated exchanges.
🚨JUST IN: CFTC Chair Michael Selig says the agency will no longer sit idly by while overzealous states undermine federal jurisdiction over prediction markets.
— 0xxamuel (@Xamuel78456474) February 17, 2026
CFTC files friend-of-the-court brief supporting Crypto. com. pic.twitter.com/VrqbYL17YF
The agency’s stance reinforces its broader position that:
- Event contracts approved under federal law fall within its authority
- States cannot override federal derivatives regulation
- Legal clarity should come through courts, not unilateral state action
The CFTC’s involvement could significantly influence appellate proceedings and shape future litigation strategy.
The Federal vs. State Battle Intensifies
Nevada has been among the most aggressive states in challenging prediction market platforms.
Recent actions in the state have included:
- Temporary restraining order requests
- Civil enforcement proceedings
- Appeals involving federally registered exchanges
By backing Crypto.com in the appeal, the CFTC is signaling that the fight over jurisdiction may ultimately hinge on federal preemption principles.
If courts rule that federal commodities law supersedes state gaming statutes for event contracts, prediction markets could continue operating nationally without state-level sports betting licenses.
Broader Implications for Prediction Markets
The dispute extends beyond Crypto.com.
Other platforms, including Coinbase and Kalshi, face similar scrutiny in multiple states.
At stake is whether sports-based event contracts:
- Must comply with state gaming licensing systems
- Can operate solely under federal derivatives oversight
- Will evolve into a parallel wagering ecosystem
The outcome could determine whether prediction markets remain centralized national exchanges or become fragmented state-by-state operations.
Industry and Political Ramifications
State regulators argue that allowing federally regulated exchanges to offer sports contracts creates competitive imbalance with licensed sportsbooks that:
- Pay state taxes
- Comply with local regulations
- Fund responsible gambling programs
Federal regulators, meanwhile, emphasize market innovation and established commodities law frameworks.
The tension has drawn attention from lawmakers, tribal gaming groups, and professional sports leagues.
What Happens Next
The Nevada appeal and related cases will likely proceed through federal appellate courts.
Potential outcomes include:
- Affirmation of federal preemption authority
- Validation of state gaming enforcement power
- A negotiated regulatory compromise
Whatever the ruling, the case is expected to set precedent for how sports-related prediction markets are treated nationwide.
Bottom Line
The CFTC has signaled support for Crypto.com in its Nevada prediction market appeal, reinforcing federal authority claims amid aggressive state enforcement efforts.
As courts weigh federal derivatives regulation against state gaming laws, the future structure of sports-based event contracts in the United States hangs in the balance.
Tags/Keywords
Mark Sullivan is a casino industry analyst and editor with a background rooted in both gaming operations and data-driven analysis. He brings a practical, ground-level understanding of how casinos function, across brick-and-mortar floors and digital platforms, while maintaining a sharp focus on player experience, transparency,...
Players trust our reporting due to our commitment to unbiased and professional evaluations of the iGaming sector. We track hundreds of platforms and industry updates daily to ensure our news feed and leaderboards reflect the most recent market shifts. With nearly two decades of experience within iGaming, our team provides a wealth of expert knowledge. This long-standing expertise enables us to deliver thorough, reliable news and guidance to our readers.