CFTC’s Mike Selig Signals Support for Prediction Markets
The CFTC withdraws a proposed ban on sports contracts as commissioner Mike Selig backs prediction markets and promises clearer regulatory rules.
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is signaling a shift in its approach to prediction markets, scrapping a proposed ban on sports-related event contracts while pledging to introduce clearer regulatory guidelines.
The move follows public comments from Mike Selig, who has emerged as a leading voice inside the agency supporting prediction markets as legitimate financial tools rather than unregulated gambling products.
The developments mark a significant moment in the ongoing debate over how sports-linked event contracts should be regulated in the United States.
CFTC Backs Away From Sports Contract Ban
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission confirmed it has withdrawn a proposed rule that would have restricted or banned certain sports-related event contracts.
Instead, the agency said it plans to develop a new regulatory framework governing prediction markets.
The reversal comes after months of industry pushback, with prediction market platforms arguing that sports-linked contracts fall squarely within the CFTC’s existing oversight of derivatives and futures markets.
By abandoning the proposed ban, the CFTC appears to acknowledge that sports-related event contracts are not easily categorized and that outright prohibition may not be the appropriate regulatory response.
Mike Selig Emerges as Prediction Market Advocate
Selig, a CFTC commissioner, has become one of the most outspoken supporters of prediction markets inside the agency.
He has argued that these markets can provide economic value through price discovery and transparency, even when contracts are tied to sports outcomes.
According to Gambling Insider, Selig has pushed back against the idea that prediction markets inherently resemble gambling, emphasizing that:
- Prediction markets operate under federal oversight
- Insider trading and manipulation are already prohibited
- Market surveillance tools exist to detect abuse
Selig’s comments suggest a philosophical divide within the broader regulatory community, particularly as state-regulated sportsbooks continue lobbying for tighter restrictions on sports-linked event contracts.
Sports Betting Industry Watches Closely
The CFTC’s shift is likely to be closely monitored by sportsbook operators, who have raised concerns about regulatory parity between prediction markets and state-licensed sports betting platforms.
Sportsbooks argue that:
- They operate under strict state licensing requirements
- They pay state-level taxes and fees
- They must comply with responsible gaming mandates
Prediction markets, by contrast, are overseen at the federal level and often avoid the state-by-state regulatory patchwork faced by sportsbooks.
The withdrawal of the proposed ban may intensify calls from sportsbook operators for clearer distinctions and more consistent oversight between financial markets and gambling products.
New Rules Expected, But Questions Remain
While the CFTC has stepped back from a ban, it has not endorsed a free-for-all. The agency has indicated that new rules are forthcoming, though specifics remain unclear.
Regulatory questions still facing the industry include:
- Which types of sports contracts will be permitted
- How insider trading rules will be enforced
- Whether certain event contracts pose public policy risks
CNBC reported that the CFTC is focused on crafting regulations that balance innovation with market integrity, rather than drawing hard lines based solely on the subject matter of contracts.
Prediction Markets Gain Ground in Washington
The regulatory shift comes amid increased lobbying and public advocacy from prediction market supporters, including recent full-page advertisements in major newspapers and growing engagement with policymakers.
Supporters argue that prediction markets have been unfairly conflated with gambling, despite operating under long-standing financial regulations.
Critics, however, warn that as contracts become more narrowly tied to individual sporting events, the line between trading and betting becomes increasingly blurred, raising concerns about consumer behavior and social impact.
What Comes Next
The CFTC’s decision to scrap its proposed ban represents a meaningful step toward regulatory clarity, but it also sets the stage for further debate.
As prediction markets continue expanding into sports, politics, and entertainment, regulators will be tasked with defining clear boundaries without stifling innovation or creating loopholes that undermine existing industries.
For now, Selig’s support and the agency’s regulatory pivot suggest prediction markets are gaining legitimacy at the federal level, even as questions about competition, consumer protection, and market fairness remain unresolved.
The next phase will hinge on what the CFTC’s promised rules look like and how aggressively they are enforced.
Tags/Keywords
Players trust our reporting due to our commitment to unbiased and professional evaluations of the iGaming sector. We track hundreds of platforms and industry updates daily to ensure our news feed and leaderboards reflect the most recent market shifts. With nearly two decades of experience within iGaming, our team provides a wealth of expert knowledge. This long-standing expertise enables us to deliver thorough, reliable news and guidance to our readers.
Latest News
