California Moves to Ban Blackjack-Style Games at Cardrooms
California regulators plan to ban blackjack-style games in cardrooms, escalating a long-running dispute with tribal casinos.
California regulators are preparing to prohibit blackjack-style games at cardrooms, a move that could significantly reshape the state’s gambling landscape and intensify tensions between tribal casinos and commercial cardrooms.
State officials confirmed that changes are underway to prevent cardrooms from offering games that closely resemble traditional blackjack, a practice tribal operators argue violates their exclusive rights under California law.
The dispute has simmered for years but is now moving toward formal regulatory action.
All California card rooms are losing the ability to have “banked games”
— Christopher DeMaci (@DeMaci_Poker) February 11, 2026
Meaning all the baccarat and black jack tables will be removed.
Will LA card rooms go belly up or go all in on poker?
Why Blackjack-Style Games Are Controversial
Under California’s constitution, tribal casinos hold exclusive rights to operate banked card games such as blackjack. Cardrooms, by contrast, are limited to player-banked games, meaning:
- Players compete against one another rather than the house
- A third-party proposition player (TPPP) may act as the bank
- The cardroom itself does not directly bank the game
Over time, cardrooms developed blackjack-style games using rotating third-party banks to comply technically with the rules. Tribal leaders argue those games effectively mirror blackjack and violate the spirit of tribal exclusivity agreements.
Card rooms across California are preparing for new state regulations in April that would essentially lead to the elimination of blackjack-style and player-dealer card games
— Ken Duffy (@kenduffynews) February 10, 2026
Operators of tribal casinos which are permitted to offer traditional blackjack argued the games are ways… pic.twitter.com/nVWqNAi0Dn
What the Ban Would Do
State regulators plan to:
- Prohibit games that replicate traditional blackjack mechanics
- Clarify that third-party banking arrangements cannot be used to simulate house-banked play
- Enforce the change through oversight of licensed cardrooms
If implemented, the rule could eliminate some of the most popular table offerings at urban cardrooms across California.
Tribal Casinos Back the Change
Tribal governments, which negotiated gaming compacts granting them exclusive rights to banked games, have long argued that cardrooms have overstepped.
Tribal leaders say:
- Blackjack exclusivity was central to voter-approved gaming agreements
- Cardrooms have expanded beyond intended limits
- Regulatory clarity is necessary to protect tribal revenue
Tribal gaming revenue funds government services such as healthcare, housing, and education for tribal communities.
Cardrooms Warn of Economic Impact
Cardroom operators oppose the proposed ban, arguing that:
- Their games comply with existing regulations
- Thousands of jobs could be affected
- Local tax revenue could decline
California cardrooms operate primarily in cities like Los Angeles, San Jose, and Sacramento, generating substantial local government revenue.
Operators also contend that previous regulatory approvals allowed these games and that an abrupt reversal could disrupt established business models.
Legal and Political Context
The fight between tribes and cardrooms has played out in multiple arenas:
- Regulatory rulemaking
- Civil lawsuits
- Legislative proposals
The issue has even reached California courts in previous challenges over gaming structure and exclusivity.
The latest regulatory push signals that state officials are aligning more closely with tribal interpretations of exclusivity.
What Happens Next
The rule change process will likely include:
- Public comment periods
- Regulatory hearings
- Final approval by state authorities
Cardrooms could pursue legal challenges if the ban is finalized.
The timeline for full implementation remains subject to administrative procedures.
Why This Matters
California operates the largest tribal gaming market in the United States. Any shift in how exclusivity is interpreted carries statewide implications.
The outcome could:
- Reinforce tribal dominance in house-banked games
- Reshape cardroom offerings
- Influence future gambling policy debates
It also underscores the delicate balance California maintains between tribal sovereignty and commercial gaming interests.
Bottom Line
California regulators are moving to prohibit blackjack-style games in cardrooms, siding with tribal casinos in a long-running dispute over exclusivity.
If finalized, the ban would mark one of the most significant shifts in California gaming policy in years, and could trigger further legal battles over the future of cardroom operations.
Tags/Keywords
Players trust our reporting due to our commitment to unbiased and professional evaluations of the iGaming sector. We track hundreds of platforms and industry updates daily to ensure our news feed and leaderboards reflect the most recent market shifts. With nearly two decades of experience within iGaming, our team provides a wealth of expert knowledge. This long-standing expertise enables us to deliver thorough, reliable news and guidance to our readers.