Fed Study Examines Kalshi’s Role in Economic Forecasting
A Federal Reserve study explores Kalshi’s prediction markets as tools for economic forecasting, as their popularity grows.
Prediction market operator Kalshi is drawing attention beyond sports and politics.
A recent Federal Reserve study is examining whether Kalshi’s event-based contracts could serve as useful tools for economic forecasting, signaling growing institutional interest in prediction markets as data sources rather than purely speculative products. It’s an interesting twist as Kalshi had an entire market on who would lead the Federal Reserve next, as the Fed was studying Kalshi.
For industry insiders, the development adds another dimension to the debate over how prediction platforms should be categorized and regulated.
Further Endorsements for Prediction Markets
— OKX Ventures (@OKX_Ventures) February 23, 2026
Federal Reserve Research Endorsement: Researchers from the Federal Reserve and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) published a new paper confirming that Kalshi's prediction data for CPI (Consumer Price Index) and the…
What the Study Explores
The study, tied to federal economic research, evaluates whether real-money event markets can generate predictive insights into macroeconomic outcomes.
Prediction markets operate by allowing participants to trade contracts tied to specific outcomes. Prices fluctuate based on supply and demand, theoretically reflecting collective expectations.
Areas of focus in the research include:
- Accuracy of market-based probability signals
- Responsiveness to new economic data
- Comparison with traditional forecasting models
- Liquidity’s impact on predictive quality
If prediction markets demonstrate reliable forecasting value, they could gain legitimacy within academic and policy circles.
Beyond Gambling: A Financial Framing
Kalshi operates under oversight from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, positioning itself as a financial exchange rather than a sportsbook.
The federal study reinforces that framing. Instead of focusing on betting activity, researchers are examining informational efficiency.
From an industry perspective, this distinction is critical.
Traditional sportsbooks are evaluated based on consumer protection and gambling compliance. Prediction markets, by contrast, argue they function as price discovery mechanisms similar to futures markets.
If federal agencies recognize forecasting value, it strengthens the argument that event contracts fall within financial regulation rather than state gambling codes.
Why This Matters for the Industry
The intersection between forecasting and wagering has long been debated.
Academic studies over the past two decades have suggested prediction markets can outperform polling and expert surveys in certain contexts. However, scaling that concept into regulated financial markets remains controversial.
Potential implications if forecasting value is validated:
- Stronger defense against state-level gambling enforcement
- Increased institutional participation
- Broader legitimacy among policymakers
- Expansion into additional event categories
For sportsbook operators, the rise of federally framed event markets presents competitive and regulatory questions.
For regulators, it raises jurisdictional tension between federal derivatives oversight and state gambling authority.
A Pivotal Moment for Prediction Markets
Kalshi has been at the center of ongoing legal battles over whether sports event contracts constitute gambling or federally regulated swaps.
A federal study exploring economic forecasting applications does not settle those disputes. However, it broadens the conversation.
Instead of viewing prediction markets solely as wagering platforms, policymakers may increasingly evaluate them as information tools. For the gambling industry, the takeaway is clear. The classification battle surrounding event contracts continues to evolve.
If prediction markets gain credibility as forecasting mechanisms, the regulatory landscape could shift significantly. The debate is no longer just about betting. It is about whether markets can generate actionable economic insight.
Tags/Keywords
Mark Sullivan is a casino industry analyst and editor with a background rooted in both gaming operations and data-driven analysis. He brings a practical, ground-level understanding of how casinos function, across brick-and-mortar floors and digital platforms, while maintaining a sharp focus on player experience, transparency,...
Players trust our reporting due to our commitment to unbiased and professional evaluations of the iGaming sector. We track hundreds of platforms and industry updates daily to ensure our news feed and leaderboards reflect the most recent market shifts. With nearly two decades of experience within iGaming, our team provides a wealth of expert knowledge. This long-standing expertise enables us to deliver thorough, reliable news and guidance to our readers.