Churchill Downs scores decisive court win over Michigan ADW rules in legal battle

Churchill Downs secured a major legal victory in Michigan, with a federal appeals court overturning state restrictions on advance deposit wagering (ADW)

Churchill Downs Incorporated (CDI) achieved a significant legal victory this week as a federal appeals court ruled in its favor in a dispute with the State of Michigan over advance deposit wagering (ADW) regulations.

The decision removes a major barrier to online horseracing wagering for Churchill Downs and marks a broader win for out-of-state off-track wagering operators seeking market access.

The dispute centered on Michigan’s restrictive approach to licensing and market participation for ADW platforms, services that allow users to deposit funds in advance and place remote wagers on horse races.

What the Court Ruled and Why It Matters

According to SBC Americas, a U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled that Michigan’s limitations on ADW licensing violated federal law and discriminated against interstate wagering operators. The court sided with Churchill Downs’ constitutional arguments, holding that the state’s requirements unlawfully restricted competition and impeded the interstate flow of commerce.

The decision essentially invalidates the state’s prior enforcement actions that sought to sideline or limit ADW operators that were not based in Michigan but still complied with federal and industry standards.

The Gaming Boardroom described the ruling as “decisive,” noting that the appeals court agreed with Churchill Downs’ position that Michigan’s regulatory framework could not impose conditions that effectively blocked ADW operators from serving customers in the state.

This outcome represents a major win for CDI, one of the largest and most influential players in U.S. horse racing and wagering, and could reshape how states regulate online pari-mutuel and advance deposit wagering going forward.

Implications for Michigan and ADW Markets

The appellate ruling has several immediate and longer-term implications:

• Expanded Market Access: Churchill Downs, and potentially other out-of-state ADW operators, can resume or expand their services in Michigan without being hampered by contested licensing restrictions.
• Regulatory Reassessment: The Michigan Gaming Control Board will likely need to revise its ADW regulatory approach to comply with the court’s interpretation of federal law and nondiscrimination principles.
• Industry Impact: The decision may embolden other operators to challenge restrictive state licensing regimes that impede interstate pari-mutuel wagering, especially if those frameworks conflict with federal statutes or constitutional commerce provisions.

For Churchill Downs, which operates one of the most recognized brands in racing, including TwinSpires, its flagship ADW platform, the win removes a major legal obstacle to serving Michigan’s sizeable racing and betting population.

Churchill Downs’ Strategy and Next Steps

Churchill Downs had argued that Michigan’s laws discriminated against non-resident wagering platforms and were inconsistent with uniform federal standards intended to facilitate widespread pari-mutuel racing wagering, including ADW.

With the appellate court ruling in hand, CDI can now pivot toward operational planning: re-engaging with Michigan regulators to ensure compliance with permissible rules and exploring marketing and service enhancements designed to re-capture market share.

Industry observers also expect the decision to influence state-level regulatory debates in other jurisdictions, particularly where similar licensing barriers have been erected under the guise of local control or revenue protection.

Conclusion: A Landmark Win for Interstate Wagering Rights

The appeals court victory for Churchill Downs represents one of the most consequential legal developments in U.S. pari-mutuel and ADW law in years.

By overturning Michigan’s restrictive approach, the court affirmed that states cannot impose discriminatory barriers that hinder interstate wagering operators from accessing licensed markets.

For Churchill Downs, the ruling clears the way for increased ADW participation in Michigan and could spark similar challenges in other states with restrictive frameworks.

For bettors and industry stakeholders, it signals a potential opening for broader, more competitive online wagering choices grounded in federal nondiscrimination principles.

As regulators and operators digest the ruling’s implications, the decision may stand as a turning point in how online horseracing wagering is governed across the country.

Mark Sullivan

Visit Profile

Players trust our reporting due to our commitment to unbiased and professional evaluations of the iGaming sector. We track hundreds of platforms and industry updates daily to ensure our news feed and leaderboards reflect the most recent market shifts. With nearly two decades of experience within iGaming, our team provides a wealth of expert knowledge. This long-standing expertise enables us to deliver thorough, reliable news and guidance to our readers.